Works index · evidence first

Documented works

Thirteen surviving page records show how a run of political animations was presented on the early web. Most of those pages were only a black background and a 550 × 400 Flash object. The entries below therefore identify what can be established without pretending to have viewed the pieces.

Abstract catalog of connected display frames and routing lines

Reading the entries

A title or phrase written by someone linking to a work is evidence of identification and reception, not a scene description. Each entry keeps those layers apart. Recorded filenames are supplied as catalog facts only. No file is offered, embedded or linked.

2003

2003

War-crimes questions

Recorded as PD.swf; inbound links framed it with a question about war crimes.

2003

Presidential satire

Recorded as idiot.swf; crude partisan link language is not used as a heading.

2003

Victory?

Recorded as swf/antivic.swf; links used “victory” and casualty-focused language.

2003

Strangelove

Recorded as swf/strangelove.swf; link language points to a cinematic allusion.

2003

Grand Theft America

Recorded as swf/joyride.swf; links associated the title with the disputed 2000 election.

2003

Partisan identity

Recorded as swf/ihr.swf; the original slogan is not repeated as a title.

2003

Church and State

Recorded as swf/faith.swf; inbound links consistently used the documented title.

2003

Poisonous Legacy

Recorded as swf/ue_lo.swf; link language connected it to depleted uranium.

2004–2005

2004

Thanks for the Memories

Recorded as swf/thanks.swf; link text placed the work against a long U.S.–Iraq relationship.

Why this index matters

URLs were part of circulation

Direct page addresses became durable handles in link lists, forum posts, blogs and email. Sometimes a link pointed to the containing HTML page; sometimes it pointed straight to a media file. The address could remain in public documents long after the software needed for playback disappeared.

The index preserves the meaningful page addresses while declining to publish the works. Technical background appears in the Flash toolchain · distribution routes · preservation questions.

One format, different records

Not every field has equal weight

A filename is direct technical evidence, but it may be cryptic or differ from the public title. A document title identifies the wrapper, but copy-and-paste errors can carry a title from one page to another. An inbound anchor shows what a linker believed was useful to say, which may reflect reaction more than description.

The strongest entry is therefore not the one with the most confident prose. It is the one that keeps these fields in their proper roles. Agreement across URL, title, object name and several links increases confidence in identification. Disagreement remains visible instead of being quietly resolved.

Years are handled at the same level. “First documented” means that the page is present in the available record by that year. It is not a claim about a private production date, premiere, commission or first public screening. No such events are inferred.

Why every entry keeps the same shape

A repeatable record lets differences become visible. When the title, filename and link language agree, that agreement is clear. When they conflict, the page can mark the conflict without forcing a false resolution. The shared structure is an editorial control: it keeps a richly documented issue from making a sparsely documented animation appear more knowable than it is.