Works index · evidence first
Documented works
Thirteen surviving page records show how a run of political animations was presented on the early web. Most of those pages were only a black background and a 550 × 400 Flash object. The entries below therefore identify what can be established without pretending to have viewed the pieces.

Reading the entries
A title or phrase written by someone linking to a work is evidence of identification and reception, not a scene description. Each entry keeps those layers apart. Recorded filenames are supplied as catalog facts only. No file is offered, embedded or linked.
2003
2003
War, democracy and liberation
Recorded as antiwar2.swf; contemporaneous links used the same three political terms.
2003
War-crimes questions
Recorded as PD.swf; inbound links framed it with a question about war crimes.
2003
Presidential satire
Recorded as idiot.swf; crude partisan link language is not used as a heading.
2003
Victory?
Recorded as swf/antivic.swf; links used “victory” and casualty-focused language.
2003
A work linked as “buddy buddy”
Recorded as swf/buddy.swf; no reliable subject description survives.
2003
Strangelove
Recorded as swf/strangelove.swf; link language points to a cinematic allusion.
2003
Grand Theft America
Recorded as swf/joyride.swf; links associated the title with the disputed 2000 election.
2003
Partisan identity
Recorded as swf/ihr.swf; the original slogan is not repeated as a title.
2003
Church and State
Recorded as swf/faith.swf; inbound links consistently used the documented title.
2003
Poisonous Legacy
Recorded as swf/ue_lo.swf; link language connected it to depleted uranium.
2004–2005
2004
Thanks for the Memories
Recorded as swf/thanks.swf; link text placed the work against a long U.S.–Iraq relationship.
2004
One year after the invasion
Recorded as swf/year.swf; inbound language marked one year in Iraq.
2005
Fourteen characteristics online
Recorded as swf/14.swf; inbound language points to Laurence W. Britt’s widely circulated 2003 essay.
Why this index matters
URLs were part of circulation
Direct page addresses became durable handles in link lists, forum posts, blogs and email. Sometimes a link pointed to the containing HTML page; sometimes it pointed straight to a media file. The address could remain in public documents long after the software needed for playback disappeared.
The index preserves the meaningful page addresses while declining to publish the works. Technical background appears in the Flash toolchain · distribution routes · preservation questions.
One format, different records
Not every field has equal weight
A filename is direct technical evidence, but it may be cryptic or differ from the public title. A document title identifies the wrapper, but copy-and-paste errors can carry a title from one page to another. An inbound anchor shows what a linker believed was useful to say, which may reflect reaction more than description.
The strongest entry is therefore not the one with the most confident prose. It is the one that keeps these fields in their proper roles. Agreement across URL, title, object name and several links increases confidence in identification. Disagreement remains visible instead of being quietly resolved.
Years are handled at the same level. “First documented” means that the page is present in the available record by that year. It is not a claim about a private production date, premiere, commission or first public screening. No such events are inferred.
Why every entry keeps the same shape
A repeatable record lets differences become visible. When the title, filename and link language agree, that agreement is clear. When they conflict, the page can mark the conflict without forcing a false resolution. The shared structure is an editorial control: it keeps a richly documented issue from making a sparsely documented animation appear more knowable than it is.